It takes 10 times more energy to send a single query to ChatGPT than it does to run a traditional Google search.

The message “go paperless, go green” has been used by companies and organizations encouraging customers to opt for digital over print. Research and newly emerging data demonstrates that it’s time to rethink this long-standing assumption.

One of the most powerful myths in sustainability today is the idea that going paperless with digital has no footprint. Emails, cloud storage, AI interactions—they all feel weightless and invisible. But the reality is far from carbon-neutral. Every digital interaction, from reading a PDF to asking ChatGPT a question, demands energy. And as AI becomes a central part of how we communicate, search, and work, that demand is growing fast—and so is the environmental toll.

The environmental costs of digital technology are increasingly visible to researchers and energy analysts, but often remain invisible to consumers. Unlike a stack of printed pages, the server farms, power grids, and cooling systems behind a simple AI-generated paperless email or chatbot query are out of sight—and out of mind. This disconnect fuels the mistaken belief that digital is always the more sustainable choice.

But as AI usage explodes, the strain on our power grids and water supplies is becoming impossible to ignore. In many regions, local communities are beginning to push back on the rapid expansion of AI data centres due to increased utility bills and environmental stress.


Article via PrintCAN